Read PDF Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges book. Happy reading Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges Pocket Guide.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Share. Description Reviews More Details. Description Electronic Inspection Copy available for instructors here This comprehensive text brings together in one volume both consideration of the core methods available for undertaking qualitative data collection and analysis, and discussion of common challenges faced by all researchers in conducting qualitative research.

Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Common Challenges contains 27 chapters, each written by an expert in the area. The first part of the volume considers common challenges in the design and execution of qualitative research, examining key contemporary debates in each area as well as providing practical advice for those undertaking organizational research. The second part of the volume looks at contemporary uses of core qualitative methods in organizational research, outlining each method and illustrating practical application through empirical examples.

Written by internationally renowned experts in qualitative research methods, this text is an accessible and essential resource for students and researchers in the areas of organization studies, business and management research, and organizational psychology. Free Returns We hope you are delighted with everything you buy from us. However, if you are not, we will refund or replace your order up to 30 days after purchase. Terms and exclusions apply; find out more from our Returns and Refunds Policy. Recently Viewed. Though this is a clear limitation of the generalizability of the results, the fit with general findings in the literature suggest that the results are still usable for other researchers.

As this is a study of evaluation methods, generalizability of the concrete findings is not a key quality of the study and therefore we consider the amount of data adequate. Another limitation is that the process data collection in the intervention is very thorough in the qualitative part and perhaps not as thorough in the quantitative where only 16 items were used to measure the process. The quantitative results presented a limited picture of the intervention, but we might be able to legitimate more complex analyses if we had included more items.

The survey was conducted after the interviews and hence the adaptation of the IPM would be influenced by crucial elements of the interviews. We suggest that researchers venturing into mixed methods evaluation designs carefully consider what aspects of the intervention process should be assessed by which data collection method. Qualitative process data has the potential to tie together meaning, context and narratives of the intervention and the organization.

The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

Both are applicable in OI evaluation but researchers must use them wisely to harness their strengths as they have different methodological presuppositions and answer different questions. JA and KN conducted the intervention and collected the data for the study. JA wrote the draft of the paper and conducted the qualitative and quantitative analyses.

PS and KN contributed substantially to its development, refinement of the analyses, presentation and discussion of the results. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Aust, B. When workplace interventions lead to negative effects: learning from failures.

Public Health 38, — Bambra, C. The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions. Community Health 61, — Bartholomew, L. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ. Biron, C. Autopsy of a failure: evaluating process and contextual issues in an organizational-level work stress intervention. Stress Manag. Boyatzis, R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar. Brannan, M. Symon and C. Braun, V.

Using thematic analysis in psychology. Bryman, A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Methods Res. Carless, S. A short measure of transformational leadership. Cox, T. Measurement of the subjective work environment. Work Stress 8, 98— Creswell, J. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press. The impact of two organizational interventions on the health of service sector workers. Health Serv.

Egan, M. Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions. Community Health 63, 4— A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control. Are simple feedback interventions involving workplace data associated with better working environment and health? A cluster randomized controlled study among Swedish VDU workers. Fabrigar, L. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.

Methods 4, — The key role of shared participation in changing occupational self-efficacy through stress management courses. Geertz, C. Gilbert-Ouimet, M. Intervention study on psychosocial work factors and mental health and musculoskeletal outcomes. Greasley, K. When do health and well-being interventions work? Managerial commitment and context. Greene, J. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Policy Anal. Griffiths, A. Organizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm.

Work Environ. Health 25, — Hasson, H. An organizational-level occupational health intervention: employee perceptions of exposure to changes, and psychosocial outcomes. Work Stress 28, — Havermans, B. Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: a systematic review. Health doi: Johns, G.

In praise of context. Johnson, R. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Kvale, S. Doing Interviews. Lipsey, M. Evaluation methods for social intervention. Mattila, P. Effect of a participative work conference on psychosocial work environment and well-being. Work Organ. Mertens, D. Publishing mixed methods research.

  1. See a Problem?!
  2. Original Research ARTICLE.
  3. He Was Some Kind of a Man: Masculinities in the B Western.
  4. Freely available.
  5. Combining Qualitative Methods - Open Research Online.
  6. Eye of the Storm (Sharon McCone, Book 8)!
  7. Product description!

Mikkelsen, A. Learning from parallel organizational development efforts in two public sector settings findings from personnel research in norway. Public Pers. The impact of a participatory organizational intervention on job stress in community health care institutions. Work Stress 14, — Murta, S. Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review. Health Promot.

Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges | Emerald Insight

Nastasi, B. Mixed methods in intervention research: theory to adaptation. Nielsen, K.

Review article: how can we make organizational interventions work? Employees and line managers as actively crafting interventions. Organizational interventions: a research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress 27, — Putting context into organizational intervention design: using tailored questionnaires to measure initiatives for worker well-being. Success or failure?

Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work Stress 20, — Health Well Being 1, — The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention.

Qualitative Organizational Research by Gillian Symon

Work Stress 26, 91— Opening the black box: presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Methods Res 1— Bauer and G. Jenny Dordrecht: Springer.

Work Stress 24, — An appraisal of key factors in the implementation of occupational stress interventions. Pawson, R. Rallis, S.

Browse by Subject

Tashakkori and C. Randall, R. Work Stress 23, 1— Rossi, P. Evaluation, a Systematic Approach , 7th Edn. Saksvik, P. A process evaluation of individual and organizational occupational stress and health interventions. Work Stress 16, 37— Semmer, N. Quick and L. A participative intervention to improve employee well-being in knowledge work jobs: a mixed-methods evaluation study. Work Stress 28, 67— Teddlie, C. Tvedt, S. Does change process healthiness reduce the negative effects of organizational change on the psychosocial work environment?

Work Stress 23, 80— Ullman, J. Schinka and W. Keywords : organizational interventions, qualitative methods, quantitative methods, research methodology, mixed methods, process evaluation. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author s or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Abildgaard, jss nrcwe. Toggle navigation. Login Register Login using.

You can login by using one of your existing accounts. We will be provided with an authorization token please note: passwords are not shared with us and will sync your accounts for you. This means that you will not need to remember your user name and password in the future and you will be able to login with the account you choose to sync, with the click of a button. Forgot Password? Suggest a Research Topic. How to Measure the Intervention Process? Saksvik 2 and Karina Nielsen 3. Introduction The evaluation of organizational interventions targeting employee health and wellbeing has been found to be a challenging task Murta et al.

What is action research?

Mixed Methods OI Evaluation Though OI evaluation has historically focused on whether the interventions improve working conditions on quantitatively measured outcomes Griffiths, mixed methods approaches have become a commonly chosen evaluation design. Quantitative Process Evaluation Data Collection A commonly used way to quantify perceptions of intervention processes is the development and use of process evaluation scales Havermans et al.

This will contribute to our understanding of how process questionnaires are best put to use in conducting evaluation of complex OIs, and we hence pose the following research question: Research question 1: What information about the intervention process is gained from quantitative process evaluation? Qualitative Process Evaluation Data Collection The other approach, qualitative evaluation, is based on collecting and analyzing data of a very different nature.

To assess the characteristics of the knowledge gained from conducting process evaluation interviews, we aim to analyze the same constructs identified in the quantitative analysis to make comparison possible and pose the second research question: Research question 2: What information about the intervention process is gained from qualitative process evaluation? Quantitative Evaluation Process Items The process questionnaire contained 22 items based on the IPM questionnaire but tailored to the specific context as recommended by Randall et al.